Recent advances of medical polyhydroxyalkanoates in musculoskeletal system
Infection and rejection in musculoskeletal trauma often pose challenges for natural healing, prompting the exploration of biomimetic organ and tissue transplantation as a common alternative solution. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are a large family of biopolyesters synthesised in microorganism, demonstrating excellent biocompatibility and controllable biodegradability for tissue remodelling and drug delivery. With different monomer-combination and polymer-types, multi-mechanical properties of PHAs making them have great application prospects in medical devices with stretching, compression, twist in long time, especially in musculoskeletal tissue engineering. This review systematically summarises the applications of PHAs in multiple tissues repair and drug release, encompassing areas such as bone, cartilage, joint, skin, tendons, ligament, cardiovascular tissue, and nervous tissue. It also discusses challenges encountered in their application, including high production costs, potential cytotoxicity, and uncontrollable particle size distribution. In conclusion, PHAs offer a compelling avenue for musculoskeletal system applications, striking a balance between biocompatibility and mechanical performance. However, addressing challenges in their production and application requires further research to unleash their full potential in tackling the complexities of musculoskeletal regeneration.
Introduction
The musculoskeletal system is the largest human organ system, including the supporting bone, cartilage and joint, skin, tendon and ligament, cardiovascular tissue and nervous tissue, which are the basis of human life activities.1 As one of the systems most commonly affected by trauma, the ability of the musculoskeletal system to spontaneously repair itself after injury varies greatly. In many cases, healing is incomplete.2⇓⇓-5 Transplantation is the only possible option for functional recovery, but problems such as infections, complications and even immune rejection occur in both autologous and allogeneic transplantation.6⇓-8 To solve these transplantation problems, biodegradable biomaterials have been developed. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) scaffolds are characterised by good biodegradability, biocompatibility and variable mechanical properties, providing a new idea for the repair and regeneration of the musculoskeletal system.9⇓-11
PHAs were discovered by Lemogine in 1926 and is kinds of bacteria-synthesised polymers,12 which can replace non-biodegradable fossil plastics, thereby reducing health hazards and negative environmental impacts.13 Compared with other biomaterials, PHAs have excellent biodegradability and biocompatibility, which has led to increasing research in the fields of biomedicine, food, cosmetics, and healthcare.14⇓⇓-17 From a chemical perspective, PHAs are aliphatic polyesters. The nanofibres range in diameter from 50 nm to 500 nm, and can perfectly simulate the collagen fibres required for the repair process of the musculoskeletal system.18,19 The PHAs’ family includes short-chain length PHA (scl-PHA; three to five carbon atoms), medium-chain length PHA (mcl-PHA; six to fourteen carbon atoms), and long-chain length PHA (fifteen or more carbon atoms).20 Scl-PHA consists of 3-hydroxybutyrate (3HB), 4-hydroxybutyrate (4HB), or 3-hydroxyvalerate. Mcl-PHA is the largest category in the PHA family, including monomeric units of 3-hydroxyhexanoate (HHx), 3-hydroxyoctanoate, 3-hydroxydecanoate, 3-hydroxydodecanoate, 3-hydroxytetradecanoate, or even longer-chain comonomer units.21 Scl-PHA and its copolymers are semi-crystalline polymers with high melting temperature, which are hard, brittle and highly crystalline in nature.22,23 Mcl-PHA, on the other hand, is a crystalline polymer that melts at a lower temperature than scl-PHA (in the range of 39-65°C), is inherently elastomer, more flexible, and has a lower crystallinity (25%), and is called true elastomer because of its lower melting point, when the temperature reaches melting temperature, they become viscous and amorphous. Can be better used in health care.24⇓⇓-27 Currently, six main types of PHA have been widely applied (Figure 1). PHAs have different mechanical properties with different molecular weights, alkyl side group lengths, and comonomer unit ratios, making them suitable for tissue engineering with different hardness levels.20,28 Currently, multiple methods have been used to prepare PHA scaffolds. The commonly used technologies include solvent casting particle leaching, fibre spinning technology, melt forming, special leaching injection moulding, freeze drying, phase separation, electrospinning, and gas foaming. This article reviews the properties of PHA scaffolds as biomaterials for musculoskeletal repair and regeneration and also summarises the applications of PHAs in bone, cartilage and joint, skin, tendon and ligament, cardiovascular tissue and nervous tissue (Figure 2).
Figure 1.

Figure 1. The general structure of PHAs and six commercial PHAs. Created with ChemDraw 2022 and Microsoft PowerPoint 2019. P34HB: poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate); P4HB: poly(4-hydroxybutyric acid); PHA: polyhydroxyalkanoate; PHB: poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid); PHBHHx: poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate); PHBV: poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate); PHBVHHx (PBVHx): poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid-co-3-hydroxyhexanoic acid trimer).
Figure 2.

Figure 2. Applications of PHA in the musculoskeletal system. Created with Microsoft PowerPoint 2019. PHA: polyhydroxyalkanoate.
The Advantages of Polyhydroxyalkanoate for the Musculoskeletal System
Materials used for musculoskeletal tissue engineering must not only have good biocompatibility, support cell growth, guide and organise cells, enable tissue ingrowth, and ultimately degrade into non-toxic products, but also have mechanical and chemical properties of the scaffold.29,30 Recent studies have found that some types of PHA have good biocompatibility and can support cell growth and proliferation.31⇓⇓-34 Furthermore, the tunable mechanical properties of PHA enable it to be widely used as a scaffold in bone tissue engineering.35 For example, by changing the percentage of HHx, the elastic properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBHHx) can be adjusted and can be applied to engineered tissues with different hardness requirements: bone, cartilage, nerves and blood vessels.31
Biocompatibility
The biocompatibility of the material reflects whether the material will be toxic to the body after implantation; therefore, good biocompatibility is a necessary prerequisite for the successful transplantation of materials for the musculoskeletal system into the human body or animals.36 In recent years, the biocompatibility of different types of PHA materials has been tested through a variety of studies. Poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid) (PHB), or polyhydroxybutyrate-co-valerate (PHBV) as a commonly used PHA material, can be used to prepare in vitro proliferation cell matrix. Chen et al.31 found that PHB and PHBV promote cell adhesion from various sources, such as fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and isolated hepatocytes. PHBV films proved to have the same properties.37 In addition, another PHA called poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid-co-3-hydroxyhexanoic acid trimer) (PHBVHHx) can significantly promote the proliferation and adhesion of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells38 and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.33
However, different types of PHA have different biocompatibilities. A study found that although both PHB and PHBV can promote cell proliferation and adhesion, PHBV has better biocompatibility.39 Another study with inoculating rabbit bone marrow cells on the PHBHHx triad scaffold found that its cell adhesion proliferation ability was significantly better than that of PHB, proving that PHBHHx also has better biocompatibility than PHB.40 In addition, some studies have shown that the biocompatibility of PHB and PHBV can be improved by surface modification. Tesema et al.41 used collagen to physically and chemically fix the surface of PHBV membrane and found that PHBV could better promote cell proliferation. Chen et al.42 improved the cytocompatibility by ion implantation into the posterior membrane. Wu et al.43 modified the surface of the PHB using gelatin and implanted adrenal cortical cells into the modified PHB. The study has shown that the modified PHB is prone to cell proliferation.43 Yu et al.44 used hyaluronic acid (HA) to modify the surface properties of PHA films. They found that HA coated on PHA membranes can improve the metabolic activity of mesenchymal stem cells.44 All of the above studies indicate that PHA has good biocompatibility and can be used in the musculoskeletal system.
Biodegradability
PHAs are a type of biopolymer made of polyesters with many different hydroxycarboxylic acid molecules,45 which can be degraded into monomers or oligomers. Whether the degradation products are toxic is closely related to whether PHA can be used in tissue engineering.36 Fortunately, among the degradation products of PHA, 3HB and 4HB are natural metabolites in the human body. 3HB is a component of the blood, and 4HB is widely distributed in all major organs of the body.30 In addition, another study has found that PHA must be degraded at an appropriate rate to prevent inflammation and rejection of the implant material.40 The biodegradability of five different types of PHA was found the biodegradability of HA is related to its chemical composition.46 Qu et al.47 found the degradation rate of PHB < PHBHHx < polylactic acid (PLA) by studying the in vivo tissue reaction and biodegradation of PHBHHx, PLA, PHB, PHBHHx (X), and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) (E) blends.
Multiple mechanical properties
The biomaterials used for musculoskeletal system recovery require a certain tensile strength, elongation at break and toughness.48,49 The reconstruction of bones, cartilage and joints in the musculoskeletal system requires a certain degree of hardness, while the recovery of muscles, tendons and ligaments requires a certain degree of toughness. Since the mechanical strength of PHA scaffolds is determined by the monomer composition of PHA, the chain length, and the distance between the ester bond and the R base, they can be widely used in the musculoskeletal system.50,51 As an important member of scl-PHA, PHB has superior thermoplastic properties, but its mechanical properties are poor and can be used to induce osteogenic processes.52 On the contrary, another type of scl-PHA, poly(4-hydroxybutyric acid), has strong ductility, tensile strength, and elasticity. In summary, scl-PHA is relatively hard and brittle, lacks toughness, and can be used for bone tissue reconstruction.30 Mcl-PHA is different from scl-PHA in that it has good flexibility and elasticity and can be used as a semi-crystalline biomaterial. As the side chain length further increases, they become stickier.53 Scl-PHA-mcl-PHA copolymer like PHBHHx can combine the benefits of both to better support the musculoskeletal system recovery. In order to obtain copolymers with more suitable mechanical properties of PHA, researchers have made many efforts to make PHA can be applied to a greater extent.54,55
Applications of Tissue-Engineered Polyhydroxyalkanoate Scaffolds in the Musculoskeletal System
As a biomaterial with good performance, various PHA types and manufacturing technologies can be used for a variety of biomedical applications, including the musculoskeletal system.56 When applied to the musculoskeletal system, PHA should not only have biocompatibility, biological activity, and good mechanical properties but also have bone conductivity and even bone sensitivity to promote the growth of new tissue.57 Due to its biological characteristics, it helps to maintain the mechanical integrity, strength, and toughness of the musculoskeletal system. In addition, it actively participates in various important biological processes such as cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, differentiation, and neuroangiogenesis and plays an important role in regulating inflammation, wound healing, and tissue repair, such as promoting the differentiation and growth of osteoblasts and chondrocytes and inhibiting the proliferation of bacteria such as Escherichia coli.58⇓⇓⇓-62 The specific applications are listed in Table 1.36,45,63⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓ -97
Table 1. Applications of PHAs in the musculoskeletal system
| Application | Materialtype | Fabricationmethod | Function | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bone | PHB/BC | Salt leaching technique | Promote bone formation in critical size calvarial defects in mice | 63 |
| PHAs/Se-Sr-HA | Solvent casting | A high reduction of the number of Staphylococcus aureus 6538P and Escherichia coli 8739 bacterial cells | 36 | |
| PHBV/PLGA | Computer-aided wet-spinning | Support murine preosteoblast cell colonisation and differentiation towards an osteoblastic phenotype | 64 | |
| TCP/PHO | Soaking and drying | Enhance the wettability towards more cell-friendly material, enhance the durability of the composites (stress-strain characteristics) | 65 | |
| P(3HO-co-3HHX)/HA | Solvent casting‐particulate leaching | Allow migration and proliferation of osteoblasts and mesenchymal cells as well as vascularisation | 66 | |
| IM-BM(PLLA+CPC+PHA) | Electrospinning | Reinforce and stabilise incomplete fractures with both mechanical testing and an animal experiment | 67 | |
| βTCP/P(3HB) | Polyurethane sponge replica method followed by polymer infiltration | Provide cell-friendly environment, ensure high cell viability, and reduce surface hydrophobicity | 68 | |
| PHBV/MBGN/CIN | Emulsion solvent extraction/evaporation | High biological activity and antibacterial performance applied simultaneously in bone tissue engineering | 69 | |
| Cartilage and joint | Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/poly(3-hydroxyoctanoate) | Electrospinning | Allow to produce a cartilage repair kit for clinical use to reduce the risk of developing secondary osteoarthritis | 70 |
| PLCL/PHBV | Emulsion solvent evaporation | Enhance the compressive modulus of PLCL scaffolds, but could also serve as scaffolding structures for cartilaginous tissue formation | 71 | |
| PHB-CS/HNT | Electrospinning | Demonstrate a significant increase in cell viability of chondrocytes | 72 | |
| PHB-starch/HNTs | Electrospinning | Improve the tensile strength, support cell growth and attachment without any toxicity for biomedical applications | 73 | |
| PhaP-RGD/PHBHHx | Solvent evaporation | The biomaterial films of PHBHHx modified with PhaP-RGD fusion protein can promote its biocompatibility with chondrocytes | 72 | |
| Promote the proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation of human umbilical-cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells seeded on PHBHHx films | 74 | |||
| Lead to more homogeneous cell spreading, better cell adhesion, proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation in the scaffolds | 75 | |||
| Skin | PHB/PHB-HV | Electrospinning | Improve vascularisation of engineered bone tissue | 76 |
| PHB/CA | Electrospinning | Improve cell proliferation | 77 | |
| PHB/HEAA | Grafting | Promote the proliferation of human fibroblasts | 78 | |
| P(3HB-co-4HB) | Freeze-drying | Promote the adhesion of mouse fibroblasts | 79 | |
| PHB | Electrospinning | Support the growth of normal human dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes | 80 | |
| Promote the healing of diabetic wounds | 81, 82 | |||
| PHBA/CA | Electrospinning | Improve fibroblast adhesion and growth | 83 | |
| Tendon and ligament | PHB/PHBV/PHUE/PHOUE | Electrospinning | Promote cell adhesion and proliferation | 84 |
| PHBHHX | Electrospinning | Promote tendon repair in vivo, which is conducive to restoring weight-bearing and motor function | 45 | |
| Make thin films | Promote adhesion and migration of mesenchymal stem cells and tendon cells | 85 | ||
| PHA | Mesh-augmented single-row RCRs and nonaugmented RCRs | Improve the initial biomechanical repair strength of tears at risk of rupture | 86 | |
| Cardiovascular | PHA | Electrospinning | Promote the fusion of scaffolds with cells | 87 |
| PHB | Electrospinning | Promote the adhesion and growth of cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts | 88 | |
| PHBHHx/SF | Make thin films | Promote cell adhesion and proliferation | 89 | |
| P(3HO) | Cardiac patches | Promote the adhesion and proliferation of neonatal ventricular rat muscle cells | 90 | |
| Nervous | PHB | Electrospinning | Have high biocompatibility with human mesenchymal stem cells | 91 |
| Promotes the adhesion and differentiation of embryonic cells into nerve cells | 92 | |||
| Support the survival and regeneration of neurons after spinal cord injury | 93 | |||
| PHB/PHBV | Electrospinning | Promote the interaction between Schwann cells and scaffolds | 93 | |
| Triggers the activity of Schwann cells | 94 | |||
| PCL-PHB | Electrospinning | Pluripotent stem cells were induced to differentiate into neurons | 95 | |
| PHBHHx | Porous nerve conduit | Have good nerve regeneration ability, which can promote the rapid functional recovery of damaged nerves | 96 | |
| Electrospinning | Promote the differentiation of neural stem cells into neurons | 97 |
Note: CA: cellulose; CIN: cinnamaldehyde; CPC: calcium phosphate cement; HA: hyaluronic acid; HEAA: N-hydroxyethyl acrylamide; HNTs: halloysite nanotubes; HV: 3-hydroxyvalerate; IM-BM: intramedullary-fixation with biodegradable materials; MBGN: mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles; P(3HB): poly(3-hydrobutyric acid); P(3HB-co-4HB): poly(3-hydrobutyric acid co-4-hydrobutyric acid); P(3HO): poly(3-hydroxyoctanoate); P(3HO-co-3HHX): poly(3‐hydroxyoctanoate‐co‐3‐hydroxyhexanoate); PCL: poly(ε-caprolactone); PhaP: polyhydroxyalkanoate granule-binding protein; PHA: polyhydroxyalkanoate; PHB: polyhydroxybutyrate; PHB/BC: polyhydroxychain alkanoate; PHB-CS: PHB-chitosan; PHBHHx: poly (D, L-lacrolyde co glycol ester); PHBV: polyhydroxy-butyrate-co-valerate; PHO: polyhydroxyoctanoate; PHOUE: poly([R]-3-hydroxy-omega-undecenoate-co-3-hydroxy-omega-nonenoate-co-3-hydroxyoctanoate-co-3-hydroxy-omega-heptenoate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate); PLCL: poly L-lactide co-ε-caprolactone; PLGA: poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid); PLLA: poly(L-lactide); RGD: Arg-Gly-Asp; SF: silk fibroin; TCP: tricalcium phosphate.
Bone
Although significant progress has been made in the field of regenerative medicine, bone tissue engineering repair and regeneration still faces major challenges given the peculiarities of bone tissue engineering.66 Many studies have shown that PHA, as a biomaterial with good properties, can promote the adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and bone cells, can inhibit bacteria to some extent, and has excellent mechanical properties compared with other biological materials. Its complexes are often used in bone tissues. In addition, scaffolds for bone tissue repair also have appropriate porous structures and microenvironments that promote cell adhesion and growth, mimicking the microstructure and function of natural bone.98,99 For example, the highly porous microspheres prepared by Wei et al.100 using PHA not only improved differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, but also support stronger osteoblast regeneration. Codreanu et al.63 investigated the restorative ability of bacterial cellulose (BC)-modified polyhydroxychain alkanoate (PHB/BC) stents obtained using salt roomsion technology in skull fractures of mice and showed that PHB/BC stents can promote osteoblast differentiation in mice. Nishizuka et al.67 developed a technology for intramedullary fixation of long bone fractures made of biodegradable materials. In animal experiments, there was no fracture displacement in the intramedullary-fixation with biodegradable materials group (poly(L-lactide) + calcium phosphate cement + PHA), even when the rabbits were fully loaded. It is shown that this type of biological scaffold can be used to strengthen and stabilise fractures of long bones.67 On the other hand, PHA scaffolds can promote cell proliferation and differentiation. Research shows that PHBHHx scaffold has adequate osteoblast attachment and proliferation roughness compared with PHB and PLA, which is suitable for myelocyte attachment, proliferation and differentiation.32 Pecorini et al.64 found that the PHBV-poly (D, L-lacrolyde-co-glycol ester) hybrid scaffold prepared by the scaffold can promote the colonisation and differentiation of rat osteoblasts into osteoblastic phenotypes. Two studies also confirmed that when PHA (polyhydroxyoctanoate and poly(3-hydrobutyric acid)) is mixed with tricalcium phosphate, it can promote cell proliferation, maintain high cell activity, and nourish surrounding tissues.68,71 In addition, the materials implanted during bone regeneration should also have certain antibacterial properties. Marcello et al.36 found that the composite sample prepared from PHA and a new antibacterial HA containing strontium selenide could inhibit the bacterial cell activity of Staphylococcus aureus 6538P and Escherichia coli 8739 with good antibacterial performance through in vitro antibacterial tests. Experiments show that P(3HO-co-3HD-co-3HDD) composite membrane loaded with different contents of Se-Sr-HA, the bactericidal effect on Staphylococcus aureus 6538P is not the same: Composite membranes containing 10 wt% Se-Sr-HA resulted in an average 90% reduction in cell numbers, but bacterial cells were reduced by an average of 96% when the Se-Sr-HA content was 30 wt%.36 Chotchindakun et al.69 used the emission solvent extraction/evaporation method to incorporate mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles into PHBV, while cinnamonaldehyde was loaded in mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles. The microspheres loaded with cinnamonaldehyde showed that the activity of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli could be significantly inhibited in the first 3 hours, and cinnamonaldehyde release behaviour lasted for 7 days. The research results suggest that the system represents an alternative model for antibacterial biomaterials and can be used for potential applications in bone tissue engineering.69 In addition, Zhao et al.101 simulated the preparation of an intracellular growth factor release system based on PLA and PHA nanoparticles under microgravity conditions, and the results proved that the mixed nanoparticles can be used as a reliable and stable medium and long term osteogenic differentiation in future space medicine.101
Cartilage and joint
At the heart of the musculoskeletal system, articular cartilage plays a role in connecting bones, absorbing mechanical loads and providing lubrication. Articular cartilage is usually understood to be an elastic connective tissue without blood vessels, nerves, or lymphatic vessels. Its damage can be caused by various causes, and the internal repair capacity of the tissue is very limited.102,103 When defects in articular cartilage cannot be repaired, it often leads to degenerative joint diseases, such as arthritis. Unfortunately, current clinical interventions have shown little effectiveness in treating such diseases, while cartilage tissue engineering offers new strategies and directions.104 Considering that PHAs have excellent properties in cartilage tissue engineering, they can be widely used as biomaterials in cartilage tissue engineering. Ching et al.70 found that nanofibre PHB/poly(3-hydroxycaprylic acid) scaffolds matched the collagen fibres and stiffness of natural cartilage and could be a good material for cartilage repair. Research has shown that the addition of halloysite nanotubes to scaffolds (such as PHB-chitosan and PHB-starch) can improve the performance of the scaffold: the tensile strength is improved, the hydrophilicity of the material is also improved, and the scaffold with halloysite nanotubes supports cell growth and attachment, and cell activity is also increased. It is expected to find application in cartilage tissue engineering.73,105 Studies have shown that polyhydroxyalkanoate granule-binding protein (PhaP) or phasin is a heat-stable amphiphilic protein located on the surface of microbial stored polyhydroxyalkanoate particles, which can be used as a natural environmentally friendly surfactant for food, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals.106 By coating the PHBHHx membrane onto the surface of Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptide-fused PhaP, Li et al.74 found that PHAP-RGD coating can promote the proliferation and cartilage differentiation of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells inoculated on the PHBHHx membrane. Despite their similar surface topography, it is worth noting that the coated film can reduce the water contact Angle from 98.69° to 10.63°.74 In addition, You et al.75 found that PHBHHx scaffolds coated with PhaP-RGD can promote the proliferation and cartilage differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Additionally, RGD also had a positive influence on the extracellular matrix: increased expression of chondrocyte-specific genes and increased content of cartilage-specific extracellular substances.75 Meanwhile, PHBHHx biomaterial membrane modified with PhaP-RGD fusion protein can also promote its biocompatibility with chondrocytes.72 Not only are porous scaffolds widely used as biodegradable biomaterials, but microspheres can also serve as potential candidates for cartilage tissue engineering. Li et al.71 found that mixing PHBV microspheres with poly L-lactide co-ε-caprolactone porous scaffolds can not only improve the compression modulus of poly L-lactide-co-caprolactone scaffolds but also serve as scaffolds formed by cartilage tissue.
Skin
Because skin wound healing is an extremely complex process, high standards apply to biomaterials used for skin tissue engineering.107,108 PHAs not only have good biocompatibility, but can also support cell growth and are often used in skin tissue engineering. PHB is the most common one in PHAs. Zonari et al.76 found that electrospun PHB/PHB-3-hydroxyvalerate fibre sheets can be used in combination with endothelial differentiated cells to promote vascularisation of bone tissue. Zhijiang et al.77 found that PHB/cellulose hybrid nanofibre scaffolds have biological activity, can promote cell proliferation, and can be used as wound dressings or tissue engineering scaffolds. Ochoa-Segundo et al.78 found that the prepared N-hydroxyethyl acrylamide monomer and PHB graft copolymer had adequate degradation and porosity, improved mechanical properties, and could promote human fibroblast culture, which could be widely used in skin tissue engineering. The biocomposite scaffold prepared by Kanimozhi et al.79 with poly (3-hydrobutyric acid co-4-hydrobutyric acid) and BC as raw materials can promote the adhesion of mouse fibroblasts and can be used for wound repair or tissue engineering scaffolds. The PHB-core-coated coaxial electrospun fibre prepared by Nagiah et al.80 has good stretch properties in skin regeneration and can support the growth of normal human dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes, indicating its potential as a scaffold for skin regeneration. In addition, studies have shown that PHB can promote the healing of diabetic wounds, so PHAs may play a role in the regeneration of diabetic wound tissue.81,82 PHBV is another polymer of PHA, and studies have shown that PHBV/chitosan (4:1) scaffolds have an excellent ability to improve the adhesion and growth of fibroblasts and can better adapt to the wound healing process in vivo.83,109
Tendon and ligament
In tendon and ligament tissue engineering, it is required that the biomaterials used not only have good mechanical properties but also that the degradation rate of polymers cannot be too fast, and the members of PHA just meet the above conditions. Rathbone et al.84 used L929 mouse fibroblasts to study the biocompatibility of PHAs. They found that the membranes prepared by PHB and PHBV not only had good biocompatibility but could effectively promote cell adhesion and proliferation and could also degrade slowly due to surface erosion. Therefore, PHA can be widely used in tendon and ligament tissue engineering.84
Since tendon injury is not easy to repair and all repair methods may have potential problems (such as foreign body reactions) and fracture again, it is required that materials used for tendon tissue engineering can simulate the structure and mechanical properties of natural tendon tissue.45,110⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓ -116 Webb et al.45 found that the PHBHHx stent can promote the repair of the Achilles tendon in rats, which is conducive to the recovery of weight-bearing and motor function. Lomas et al.85 found that PHBHHx may be a suitable polymer for cell/polymer replacement strategies in future tendon repair. Tashjian et al.86 suggested that PHA could be used to improve the initial biomechanical repair strength of tears at risk of rupture.
Cardiovascular tissue
Because the musculoskeletal system is rich in blood vessels, these blood vessels can effectively maintain the homeostasis of the musculoskeletal system and effectively promote bone formation to a certain extent.117 Therefore, the vascular repair is particularly important of the musculoskeletal system. Considering that PHA has good angiogenesis, biocompatibility and biodegradability and can prevent adverse remodelling of defective tissues, PHA has been successfully used in vascular tissue engineering.88,109 The regenerative filament protein silk fibroin and PHBHHx porous scaffold prepared by Sun et al.89 can promote cell adhesion and proliferation. Therefore, the silk fibroin-modified PHBHHx material could be a potential material for vascular tissue engineering.89 Bagdadi et al.90 used a novel functional material, poly (3-hydroxyoctane ester), a mcl-PHA, to create engineered structures with improved mechanical properties, and they found that the polymer enhances the adhesion and proliferation of neonatal ventricular rat myocytes. The mechanical properties of the final patch were similar to those of the myocardium.90 The above studies show that PHA can be widely used in musculoskeletal vascular repair.
Nervous tissue
Nerve damage can block the connection between the neuroregulatory brain and muscles, ultimately affecting motor function and even leading to permanent disability.93,109 Therefore, the fabrication of effective biomaterial scaffolds is a more successful treatment to promote nerve tissue regeneration in nerve injuries.118 Some studies have shown that PHA can promote nerve repair and is widely used in nerve tissue engineering. Köse et al.91 combined random or arranged electrospun nanofibre PHB membranes with human mesenchymal stem cells to form axon scaffolds for bone and spinal cord, and they found that the PHB membrane has high biocompatibility with human mesenchymal stem cells and provides good biomaterials for bone or nerve tissue engineering. Because Schwann cells physiologically promote the growth of regenerated axons, the interaction between Schwann cells and scaffolds is particularly important in neural tissue engineering. The data presented by Masaeli et al.94 manufactured PHB/PHBV/collagen fibres can effectively promote the proliferation of Schwann cells and facilitate the regeneration of the myelin membrane. Therefore, PHB/PHBV electrostatic spinning nanofibres can be used in nerve tissue engineering.93,94 The PHB scaffold prepared by Khorasani et al.92 can promote the attachment and differentiation of mouse embryonic cells into nerve cells. The results show that PHB can be used as a material for neural tissue engineering. Kuo et al.95 found that poly(ε-caprolactone)-PHB scaffolds transplanted with neuron growth factor can induce pluripotent stem cells to differentiate into neurons, and this scaffold is promising in neural tissue engineering. Novikova et al.119 found that PHBs support the survival and regeneration of neurons after spinal cord injury.
In addition to PHB, other PHA materials can also effectively promote the repair of nerve injuries. Bian et al.96 found that the porous nerve conduit prepared by PHBHHx not only has good mechanical properties but also can promote nerve regeneration and rapid functional recovery of damaged nerves. In addition, it has been found that PLA, PHB, the copolymer of 3HB and 4HB, and PHBHHx can promote the growth and differentiation of neural stem cells. PHBHHx has the strongest potential to promote the differentiation of neural stem cells into neurons. Therefore, these materials are conducive to the repair of the central nervous system.97,120
Applications of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Carriers in Drug Delivery in the Musculoskeletal System
Drug delivery technology, as an important part of healthcare, aims to deliver pharmacologically active drugs to specific sites of action using appropriate drug carriers at the most appropriate drug delivery rate and dose, while minimising the impact on the body and the occurrence of adverse reactions. Silicone, as an organic compound, is widely used to encapsulate hydrophobic drugs, but recent studies have shown that silicone has the potential to cause cancer.121,122 In recent decades, researchers have shown great interest in developing biodegradable polymeric materials from natural sources as drug delivery materials and have achieved positive results. Due to their good biocompatibility and biodegradability, PHAs have attracted great attention in drug delivery systems.123,124 The reason why PHAs can serve as good drug carriers is not only because of their unique physicochemical properties but also because they can be processed into films, scaffolds, microspheres, and nanoparticles as needed, which facilitates drug encapsulation. Some studies have shown that drug delivery systems such as hydrogels, microspheres, microcapsules, polymer vesicles, microns and nanoparticles are widely used to deliver a variety of therapeutic drugs, such as proteins, narcotics, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory drugs, anticancer drugs, hormones, etc. PHA can be used as a drug delivery carrier to participate in these processes.124⇓⇓⇓⇓-129
Considering the properties of tetracycline, Sendil et al.130 prepared PHBV microspheres and microcapsules that can be successfully used to load tetracycline, an antibiotic for periodontitis. The author investigated their encapsulation efficiency, loading, release kinetics, and morphological properties. At the same time, it was found that the antibiotics were fully released before degradation of PHBV was observed.130 Kassab et al.131 performed experiments using PHB microspheres, with a drug loading of up to 407.6 mg of rifampicin/g PHB. The release rate of the drug is very high. Xiong et al.132 compared the controlled intracellular drug release behaviour encapsulated in PHB, PHBHHx, and PLA nanoparticles. The results showed that PHB and PHBHHx nanoparticles could load over 75% of rhodamine B isothiocyanate, while PHB and PHBHHx nanoparticles continued to release drugs for at least 20 days, while PLA nanoparticles only for 15 days release. This study is the first to demonstrate that PHB and PHBHHx can effectively control intracellular drug release.132 Because the PHA delivery system can deliver and maintain sufficient antibiotic concentrations at the infection site, PHB can be widely used for local administration to treat osteomyelitis. However, since systemic administration may be ineffective due to damage to the vascular system, in diseases such as osteomyelitis it is best to ensure local administration through the implantation of pharmaceutical preparations. A study found that PHBV robs containing 7%, 14% and 22% (mol) 14-hydroxyvalvonic acid exhibit late antibiotic release behaviour lasting approximately 2 months in physiological phosphate buffers under in vitro conditions, whereas appropriate antibiotic treatment produces a minimum effective concentration of at least 6 weeks.133 It was found that, in addition to PHBV, PHB and P(3HB-4HB) can also be processed into implantable rods for local administration of antibiotics for the treatment of osteomyelitis.133⇓-135 Scheithauer et al.136 prepared PHBV microspheres loaded with phytoestrogens; daidzein did not cause any shear or temperature stress on the drugs. The encapsulated daidzein was initially released at a low level (6.1% for 7 hours) and then continuously for 3 days. Therefore, PHBV microspheres with daidzein delivery functions can also be used in the treatment of osteoporosis and bone tissue engineering.136 Peng et al.137 explored a novel PHB nanoparticle loaded with hydrophilic recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and amphiphilic phosphatide (BPC-PHB NP). The osteogenic differentiation gene markers of BPC-PHB NPs samples were significantly upregulated, suggesting that BPC-PHB NPs could serve as a fast-acting and long-acting bone morphogenetic protein 2 delivery system for osteogenic differentiation.137 Chen et al.138 designed a novel long-acting bone morphogenetic protein 7 release system based on poly(4-hydroxybutyric acid) nanoparticles to achieve osteogenic differentiation of human adipose mesenchymal stem cells. The results indicate that bone morphogenetic protein 7-soybean lecithin-poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) nanoparticles can be used as a fast and long-acting bone morphogenetic protein 7 delivery system for osteogenic differentiation.138 PHA drug delivery systems have great potential due to their non-immunogenic, sustained and controlled drug release, targeted delivery, and high drug loading capabilities.139 Nevertheless, certain properties of PHAs may hinder their use in drug delivery systems. Some of these include high hydrophobicity, low thermal stability, and slow degradation rates.140
Application of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Degradation Products and Derivatives in the Musculoskeletal System
PHA is a biodegradable biopolymer, and as one of the degradation products of PHA, 3HB is a component of the blood and is widely used in the musculoskeletal system.30,141⇓ -143 Zhao et al.144 found that 3HB can promote osteoblast growth in vitro and anti-osteoporosis in vivo. Therefore, 3HB monomers containing PHA can be used as an effective bone implant material.144 Skibiński et al.68 found that novel composite materials based on β-tricalcium phosphate and poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid) bacteria-derived biopolymer can promote the adhesion and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells and consider this material as a potential candidate for bone tissue regeneration. Czechowska et al.145 found that the β-tricalcium phosphate-based polyporous scaffold modified with silver and coated with the biopolymer poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)-poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid) bacteria-derived biopolymer can promote the regeneration of bone tissue, and this scaffold is considered more promising bone substitute. A study has found that 3HB can also significantly inhibit the loss of muscle weight, muscle fibre size, and muscle fibre diameter, so it can effectively treat muscle atrophy.146
4HB and 3HHx are also degradation products of PHA, and when they coexist with 3HB, they can also be used in the musculoskeletal system. Wang et al.147 found that the electrospun poly (3-hydrobutyric acid co-4-hydrobutyric acid)/octacalcium phosphate nanofibre membrane had good mechanical properties and bone induction ability. Ang et al.148 found that the mixture of P(3HB-co-3HHx) and fibroin protein could promote the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells. Studies have shown that poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) (P(3HB-4HB-3HHx)) can significantly promote cell proliferation, so P(3HB-4HB-3HHx) can be used in the musculoskeletal system.34
Conclusions and Future Perspectives
The musculoskeletal system, as the heart of human movement, has certain peculiarities in its regeneration and recovery: repairing bone tissue requires a certain level of hardness, while tendons and ligaments pay more attention to toughness. Many treatment methods have their advantages and disadvantages, and biomaterials have provided new ideas for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders in recent years. The selection of biomaterials has also attracted considerable attention from researchers. In addition to its special mechanical properties, a suitable biomaterial must also have good biocompatibility, a suitable degradation time and certain antibacterial properties in order to avoid local infections. As a biomaterial in regenerative medicine, PHA has great potential for use in the musculoskeletal system. With the addition of many manufacturing technologies and other materials, the various properties of PHA have been significantly improved. Furthermore, PHA scaffolds have shown great potential for drug delivery.
The production process and material properties of PHA are constantly improving, but there are still many challenges.149 Unlike other biopolymers (such as marine-derived collagen, which has a wide range of sources and simple extraction methods), one of the most significant disadvantages of PHA is its high production cost, and its high price is the result of the need for large quantities of high-purity substrates as well as labour-intensive production and downstream processing.150 At the same time, there may be some cases during PHA processing where organic solvents are not completely removed, which may lead to PHA being cytotoxic and not conducive to musculoskeletal tissue repair.151,152 We can control the physical and chemical properties of PHA through certain technical means, but it is undeniable that there are reports that PHA can cause acute and chronic inflammation, and at the same time, the particle size and distribution of PHA are still very uncontrollable.65,147 According to the current trend of PHA application, it has inestimable potential in the musculoskeletal system, but the great challenges it faces are also a fact that cannot be ignored. On the one hand, the large-scale high-quality production of PHA requires researchers to devote more energy to research, on the other hand, the specific problems encountered in the specific application of PHA, for example, How the hydrophobicity is applied in human tissues, the degradation rate under specific conditions, whether there is a suitable drug release rate, how to make the elasticity and hardness meet the tissue requirements, and maintain the integrity of the scaffold structure need further research and exploration.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: DXW, JWD; data collection and literature reviewing: CHM, XYQ and JZ; manuscript draft: CHM; manuscript revision: CHM, DXW, YWD. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Financial support
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nos. 31900950 and 32000944 and Key Science and Technology Plan Projects in Zigong, No. 2022ZCNKY07.
Acknowledgement
None.
Conflicts of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open access statement
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
1. Barone, R.; Szychlinska, M. A. Highlights in pathophysiology of the musculoskeletal system. Int J Mol Sci. 2023, 24, 6412.
2. Christensen, L. V. Physiology and pathophysiology of skeletal muscle contractions. Part I. Dynamic activity. J Oral Rehabil. 1986, 13, 451-461.
3. Christensen, L. V. Physiology and pathophysiology of skeletal muscle contractions. Part II. Static activity. J Oral Rehabil. 1986, 13, 463-477.
4. Evans, C. H. Advances in regenerative orthopedics. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013, 88, 1323-1339.
5. Evans, C. H.; Huard, J. Gene therapy approaches to regenerating the musculoskeletal system. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015, 11, 234-242.
6. Gobbi, A.; Francisco, R. A.; Lubowitz, J. H.; Allegra, F.; Canata, G. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: randomized controlled trial comparing chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteochondral autograft transplantation. Arthroscopy. 2006, 22, 1085-1092.
7. Jackson, D. W.; Grood, E. S.; Goldstein, J. D.; Rosen, M. A.; Kurzweil, P. R.; Cummings, J. F.; Simon, T. M. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and allograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the goat model. Am J Sports Med. 1993, 21, 176-185.
8. Kolesky, D. B.; Truby, R. L.; Gladman, A. S.; Busbee, T. A.; Homan, K. A.; Lewis, J. A. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv Mater. 2014, 26, 3124-3130.
9. Ren, Z. W.; Wang, Z. Y.; Ding, Y. W.; Dao, J. W.; Li, H. R.; Ma, X.; Yang, X. Y.; Zhou, Z. Q.; Liu, J. X.; Mi, C. H.; Gao, Z. C.; Pei, H.; Wei, D. X. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: the natural biopolyester for future medical innovations. Biomater Sci. 2023, 11, 6013-6034.
10. Zhao, X. H.; Niu, Y. N.; Mi, C. H.; Gong, H. L.; Yang, X. Y.; Cheng, J. S. Y.; Zhou, Z. Q.; Liu, J. X.; Peng, X. L.; Wei, D. X. Electrospinning nanofibers of microbial polyhydroxyalkanoates for applications in medical tissue engineering. J Polym Sci. 2021, 59, 1994-2013.
11. Wang, Z. Y.; Zhang, X. W.; Ding, Y. W.; Ren, Z. W.; Wei, D. X. Natural biopolyester microspheres with diverse structures and surface topologies as micro-devices for biomedical applications. Smart Mater Med. 2023, 4, 15-36.
12. Anderson, A. J.; Dawes, E. A. Occurrence, metabolism, metabolic role, and industrial uses of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates. Microbiol Rev. 1990, 54, 450-472.
13. Palencia, M.; Lerma, T. A.; Garcés, V.; Mora, M. A.; Martínez, J. M.; Palencia, S. L. Chapter 19 - Functional and eco-friendly polymers in textile applications. In Eco-friendly functional polymers, Palencia, M.; Lerma, T. A.; Garcés, V.; Mora, M. A.; Martínez, J. M.; Palencia, S. L., eds. Elsevier: 2021; pp 285-293.
14. Mastrogiacomo, M.; Muraglia, A.; Komlev, V.; Peyrin, F.; Rustichelli, F.; Crovace, A.; Cancedda, R. Tissue engineering of bone: search for a better scaffold. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2005, 8, 277-284.
15. Troschl, C.; Meixner, K.; Drosg, B. Cyanobacterial PHA production - review of recent advances and a summary of three years’ working experience running a pilot plant. Bioengineering (Basel). 2017, 4, 26.
16. Peng, X. L.; Cheng, J. S.; Gong, H. L.; Yuan, M. D.; Zhao, X. H.; Li, Z.; Wei, D. X. Advances in the design and development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Mil Med Res. 2021, 8, 67.
17. Liu, J.; Zhou, Z.; Li, H.; Yang, X.; Wang, Z.; Xiao, J.; Wei, D. X. Current status and challenges in the application of microbial PHA particles. Particuology. 2024, 87, 286-302.
18. Li, X. T.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, G. Q. Nanofibrous polyhydroxyalkanoate matrices as cell growth supporting materials. Biomaterials. 2008, 29, 3720-3728.
19. Bassas-Galià, M.; Gonzalez, A.; Micaux, F.; Gaillard, V.; Piantini, U.; Schintke, S.; Zinn, M.; Mathieu, M. Chemical modification of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) for the preparation of hybrid biomaterials. Chimia. 2015, 69, 627-630.
20. Ai, M.; Zhu, Y.; Jia, X. Recent advances in constructing artificial microbial consortia for the production of medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoates. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 2.
21. Chen, S.; Liu, Q.; Wang, H.; Zhu, B.; Yu, F.; Chen, G. Q.; Inoue, Y. Polymorphic crystallization of fractionated microbial medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoates. Polymer. 2009, 50, 4378-4388.
22. Grigore, M. E.; Grigorescu, R. M.; Iancu, L.; Ion, R. M.; Zaharia, C.; Andrei, E. R. Methods of synthesis, properties and biomedical applications of polyhydroxyalkanoates: a review. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2019, 30, 695-712.
23. Witholt, B.; Kessler, B. Perspectives of medium chain length poly(hydroxyalkanoates), a versatile set of bacterial bioplastics. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1999, 10, 279-285.
24. Ishak, K. A.; Velayutham, T. S.; Annuar, M. S. M.; Sirajudeen, A. A. O. Structure-property interpretation of biological polyhydroxyalkanoates with different monomeric composition: dielectric spectroscopy investigation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021, 169, 311-320.
25. Savenkova, L.; Gercberga, Z.; Nikolaeva, V.; Dzene, A.; Bibers, I.; Kalnin, M. Mechanical properties and biodegradation characteristics of PHB-based films. Process Biochem. 2000, 35, 573-579.
26. Ciesielski, S.; Pokoj, T.; Mozejko, J.; Klimiuk, E. Molecular identification of polyhydroxyalkanoates-producing bacteria isolated from enriched microbial community. Pol J Microbiol. 2013, 62, 45-50.
27. Wecker, P.; Moppert, X.; Simon-Colin, C.; Costa, B.; Berteaux-Lecellier, V. Discovery of a mcl-PHA with unexpected biotechnical properties: the marine environment of French Polynesia as a source for PHA-producing bacteria. AMB Express. 2015, 5, 74.
28. Koller, M. Biodegradable and biocompatible polyhydroxy-alkanoates (PHA): auspicious microbial macromolecules for pharmaceutical and therapeutic applications. Molecules. 2018, 23, 362.
29. Williams, S. F.; Martin, D. P.; Horowitz, D. M.; Peoples, O. P. PHA applications: addressing the price performance issue: I. Tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 1999, 25, 111-121.
30. Lim, J.; You, M.; Li, J.; Li, Z. Emerging bone tissue engineering via polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA)-based scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017, 79, 917-929.
31. Chen, G. Q.; Wu, Q. The application of polyhydroxyalkanoates as tissue engineering materials. Biomaterials. 2005, 26, 6565-6578.
32. Wang, Y. W.; Wu, Q.; Chen, G. Q. Attachment, proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts on random biopolyester poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2004, 25, 669-675.
33. Hu, Y. J.; Wei, X.; Zhao, W.; Liu, Y. S.; Chen, G. Q. Biocompatibility of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5, 1115-1125.
34. Wei, X.; Hu, Y. J.; Xie, W. P.; Lin, R. L.; Chen, G. Q. Influence of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) on growth and osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009, 90, 894-905.
35. Wu, Y. L.; Wang, H.; Qiu, Y. K.; Liow, S. S.; Li, Z.; Loh, X. J. PHB-based gels as delivery agents of chemotherapeutics for the effective shrinkage of tumors. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016, 5, 2679-2685.
36. Marcello, E.; Maqbool, M.; Nigmatullin, R.; Cresswell, M.; Jackson, P. R.; Basnett, P.; Knowles, J. C.; Boccaccini, A. R.; Roy, I. Antibacterial composite materials based on the combination of polyhydroxyalkanoates with selenium and strontium co-substituted hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 647007.
37. Shishatskaya, E. I.; Volova, T. G. A comparative investigation of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoate films as matrices for in vitro cell cultures. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004, 15, 915-923.
38. Ji, G. Z.; Wei, X.; Chen, G. Q. Growth of human umbilical cord Wharton’s Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells on the terpolyester poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate). J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2009, 20, 325-339.
39. Ahmed, T.; Marçal, H.; Lawless, M.; Wanandy, N. S.; Chiu, A.; Foster, L. J. Polyhydroxybutyrate and its copolymer with polyhydroxyvalerate as biomaterials: influence on progression of stem cell cycle. Biomacromolecules. 2010, 11, 2707-2715.
40. Yang, M.; Zhu, S.; Chen, Y.; Chang, Z.; Chen, G.; Gong, Y.; Zhao, N.; Zhang, X. Studies on bone marrow stromal cells affinity of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate). Biomaterials. 2004, 25, 1365-1373.
41. Tesema, Y.; Raghavan, D.; Stubbs Iii, J. Bone cell viability on collagen immobilized poly(3-hydroxybutrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) membrane: Effect of surface chemistry. J Appl Polym Sci. 2004, 93, 2445-2453.
42. Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Hu, P. Surface modification of polyhydroxyalkanoates by ion implantation. Characterization and cytocompatibility improvement. Polym J. 2003, 35, 148-154.
43. Wu, T. P.; Hu, R.; Zhang, X. B.; Li, W.; Chen, F. Biocompatibility of modified poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid to adrenocortical cells. J Wuhan Univ Technol Mater Sci Ed. 2004, 19, 38-40.
44. Yu, B. Y.; Chen, P. Y.; Sun, Y. M.; Lee, Y. T.; Young, T. H. Effects of the surface characteristics of polyhydroxyalkanoates on the metabolic activities and morphology of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2010, 21, 17-36.
45. Webb, W. R.; Dale, T. P.; Lomas, A. J.; Zeng, G.; Wimpenny, I.; El Haj, A. J.; Forsyth, N. R.; Chen, G. Q. The application of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) scaffolds for tendon repair in the rat model. Biomaterials. 2013, 34, 6683-6694.
46. Volova, T. G.; Shishatskaya, E. I.; Nikolaeva, E. D.; Sinskey, A. J. In vivo study of 2D PHA matrices of different chemical compositions: tissue reactions and biodegradations. Mater Sci Technol. 2014, 30, 549-557.
47. Qu, X. H.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, K. Y.; Chen, G. Q. In vivo studies of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) based polymers: biodegradation and tissue reactions. Biomaterials. 2006, 27, 3540-3548.
48. Fan, L.; Hu, L.; Xie, J.; He, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Wei, D.; Yao, D.; Su, F. Biosafe, self-adhesive, recyclable, tough, and conductive hydrogels for multifunctional sensors. Biomater Sci. 2021, 9, 5884-5896.
49. Li, Y.; Xiao, L.; Wei, D.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Lian, R.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, J.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, C.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J. Injectable biomimetic hydrogel guided functional bone regeneration by adapting material degradation to tissue healing. Adv Funct Mater. 2023, 33, 2213047.
50. Dwivedi, R.; Pandey, R.; Kumar, S.; Mehrotra, D. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA): role in bone scaffolds. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020, 10, 389-392.
51. Anjum, A.; Zuber, M.; Zia, K. M.; Noreen, A.; Anjum, M. N.; Tabasum, S. Microbial production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) and its copolymers: A review of recent advancements. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016, 89, 161-174.
52. Arrington, E. D.; Smith, W. J.; Chambers, H. G.; Bucknell, A. L.; Davino, N. A. Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996, 300-309.
53. Hazer, B.; Steinbüchel, A. Increased diversification of polyhydroxyalkanoates by modification reactions for industrial and medical applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007, 74, 1-12.
54. Sharma, V.; Sehgal, R.; Gupta, R. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA): properties and modifications. Polymer. 2021, 212, 123161.
55. Sudesh, K.; Abe, H.; Doi, Y. Synthesis, structure and properties of polyhydroxyalkanoates: biological polyesters. Prog Polym Sci. 2000, 25, 1503-1555.
56. Pryadko, A.; Surmeneva, M. A.; Surmenev, R. A. Review of hybrid materials based on polyhydroxyalkanoates for tissue engineering applications. Polymers (Basel). 2021, 13, 1738.
57. Velasco, M. A.; Narváez-Tovar, C. A.; Garzón-Alvarado, D. A. Design, materials, and mechanobiology of biodegradable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Res Int. 2015, 2015, 729076.
58. Mota, C.; Wang, S. Y.; Puppi, D.; Gazzarri, M.; Migone, C.; Chiellini, F.; Chen, G. Q.; Chiellini, E. Additive manufacturing of poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-(R)-3-hydroxyhexanoate] scaffolds for engineered bone development. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017, 11, 175-186.
59. Doyle, C.; Tanner, E. T.; Bonfield, W. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of polyhydroxybutyrate and of polyhydroxybutyrate reinforced with hydroxyapatite. Biomaterials. 1991, 12, 841-847.
60. Wang, Y.; Jiang, X. L.; Yang, S. C.; Lin, X.; He, Y.; Yan, C.; Wu, L.; Chen, G. Q.; Wang, Z. Y.; Wu, Q. MicroRNAs in the regulation of interfacial behaviors of MSCs cultured on microgrooved surface pattern. Biomaterials. 2011, 32, 9207-9217.
61. Ellis, G.; Cano, P.; Jadraque, M.; Martín, M.; López, L.; Núñez, T.; de la Peña, E.; Marco, C.; Garrido, L. Laser microperforated biodegradable microbial polyhydroxyalkanoate substrates for tissue repair strategies: an infrared microspectroscopy study. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011, 399, 2379-2388.
62. Wei, D.; Zhang, X. Biosynthesis, bioactivity, biotoxicity and applications of antimicrobial peptides for human health. Biosaf Health. 2022, 4, 118-134.
63. Codreanu, A.; Balta, C.; Herman, H.; Cotoraci, C.; Mihali, C. V.; Zurbau, N.; Zaharia, C.; Rapa, M.; Stanescu, P.; Radu, I. C.; Vasile, E.; Lupu, G.; Galateanu, B.; Hermenean, A. Bacterial cellulose-modified polyhydroxyalkanoates scaffolds promotes bone formation in critical size calvarial defects in mice. Materials (Basel). 2020, 13, 1433.
64. Pecorini, G.; Braccini, S.; Parrini, G.; Chiellini, F.; Puppi, D. Additive manufacturing of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) biphasic scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2022, 23, 3895.
65. Lezcano, M. F.; Álvarez, G.; Chuhuaicura, P.; Godoy, K.; Alarcón, J.; Acevedo, F.; Gareis, I.; Dias, F. J. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) scaffolds for peripheral nerve regeneration: a systematic review of animal models. Biology (Basel). 2022, 11, 706.
66. Ansari, N. F.; Annuar, M. S. M.; Murphy, B. P. A porous medium-chain-length poly(3-hydroxyalkanoates)/hydroxyapatite composite as scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Eng Life Sci. 2017, 17, 420-429.
67. Nishizuka, T.; Kurahashi, T.; Hara, T.; Hirata, H.; Kasuga, T. Novel intramedullary-fixation technique for long bone fragility fractures using bioresorbable materials. PLoS One. 2014, 9, e104603.
68. Skibiński, S.; Czechowska, J. P.; Cichoń, E.; Seta, M.; Gondek, A.; Cudnoch-Jędrzejewska, A.; Ślósarczyk, A.; Guzik, M.; Zima, A. Study on βTCP/P(3HB) scaffolds-physicochemical properties and biological performance in low oxygen concentration. Int J Mol Sci. 2022, 23, 11587.
69. Chotchindakun, K.; Pekkoh, J.; Ruangsuriya, J.; Zheng, K.; Unalan, I.; Boccaccini, A. R. Fabrication and characterization of cinnamaldehyde-loaded mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles/PHBV-based microspheres for preventing bacterial infection and promoting bone tissue regeneration. Polymers (Basel). 2021, 13, 1794.
70. Ching, K. Y.; Andriotis, O. G.; Li, S.; Basnett, P.; Su, B.; Roy, I.; Tare, R. S.; Sengers, B. G.; Stolz, M. Nanofibrous poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/poly(3-hydroxyoctanoate) scaffolds provide a functional microenvironment for cartilage repair. J Biomater Appl. 2016, 31, 77-91.
71. Li, C.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Moran, S.; Khang, G.; Ge, Z. Poly (l-lactide-co-caprolactone) scaffolds enhanced with poly (β-hydroxybutyrate-co-β-hydroxyvalerate) microspheres for cartilage regeneration. Biomed Mater. 2013, 8, 025005.
72. Gao, T.; Chang, H.; Fan, M.; Lu, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Jing, X.; Shi, Y.; Li, Z. Bio-modification of polyhydroxyalkanoates and its biocompatibility with chondrocytes. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014, 28, 1023-1029.
73. Movahedi, M.; Karbasi, S. Electrospun halloysite nanotube loaded polyhydroxybutyrate-starch fibers for cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022, 214, 301-311.
74. Li, X.; Chang, H.; Luo, H.; Wang, Z.; Zheng, G.; Lu, X.; He, X.; Chen, F.; Wang, T.; Liang, J.; Xu, M. Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) scaffolds coated with PhaP-RGD fusion protein promotes the proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015, 103, 1169-1175.
75. You, M.; Peng, G.; Li, J.; Ma, P.; Wang, Z.; Shu, W.; Peng, S.; Chen, G. Q. Chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) scaffolds coated with PHA granule binding protein PhaP fused with RGD peptide. Biomaterials. 2011, 32, 2305-2313.
76. Zonari, A.; Novikoff, S.; Electo, N. R.; Breyner, N. M.; Gomes, D. A.; Martins, A.; Neves, N. M.; Reis, R. L.; Goes, A. M. Endothelial differentiation of human stem cells seeded onto electrospun polyhydroxybutyrate/polyhydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate fiber mesh. PLoS One. 2012, 7, e35422.
77. Zhijiang, C.; Yi, X.; Haizheng, Y.; Jia, J.; Liu, Y. Poly(hydroxybutyrate)/cellulose acetate blend nanofiber scaffolds: preparation, characterization and cytocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016, 58, 757-767.
78. Ochoa-Segundo, E. I.; González-Torres, M.; Cabrera-Wrooman, A.; Sánchez-Sánchez, R.; Huerta-Martínez, B. M.; Melgarejo-Ramírez, Y.; Leyva-Gómez, G.; Rivera-Muñoz, E. M.; Cortés, H.; Velasquillo, C.; Vargas-Muñoz, S.; Rodríguez-Talavera, R. Gamma radiation-induced grafting of n-hydroxyethyl acrylamide onto poly(3-hydroxybutyrate): A companion study on its polyurethane scaffolds meant for potential skin tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020, 116, 111176.
79. Kanimozhi, K.; Basha, S. K.; Kaviyarasu, K.; SuganthaKumari, V. Salt leaching synthesis, characterization and in vitro cytocompatibility of chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol)/methylcellulose - ZnO nanocomposites scaffolds using L929 fibroblast cells. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 4447-4457.
80. Nagiah, N.; Madhavi, L.; Anitha, R.; Anandan, C.; Srinivasan, N. T.; Sivagnanam, U. T. Development and characterization of coaxially electrospun gelatin coated poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid) thin films as potential scaffolds for skin regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013, 33, 4444-4452.
81. Sanhueza, C.; Hermosilla, J.; Bugallo-Casal, A.; Da Silva-Candal, A.; Taboada, C.; Millán, R.; Concheiro, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Acevedo, F. One-step electrospun scaffold of dual-sized gelatin/poly-3-hydroxybutyrate nano/microfibers for skin regeneration in diabetic wound. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021, 119, 111602.
82. Feng, J.; Niu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zuo, H.; Wang, S.; Liu, X. Ficus carica extract impregnated amphiphilic polymer scaffold for diabetic wound tissue regenerations. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2021, 49, 219-229.
83. Veleirinho, B.; Coelho, D. S.; Dias, P. F.; Maraschin, M.; Ribeiro-do-Valle, R. M.; Lopes-da-Silva, J. A. Nanofibrous poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/chitosan scaffolds for skin regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol. 2012, 51, 343-350.
84. Rathbone, S.; Furrer, P.; Lübben, J.; Zinn, M.; Cartmell, S. Biocompatibility of polyhydroxyalkanoate as a potential material for ligament and tendon scaffold material. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010, 93, 1391-1403.
85. Lomas, A. J.; Chen, G. G.; El Haj, A. J.; Forsyth, N. R. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) supports adhesion and migration of mesenchymal stem cells and tenocytes. World J Stem Cells. 2012, 4, 94-100.
86. Tashjian, R. Z.; Kolz, C. W.; Suter, T.; Henninger, H. B. Biomechanics of polyhydroxyalkanoate mesh-augmented single-row rotator cuff repairs. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016, 45, E527-E533.
87. Sodian, R.; Sperling, J. S.; Martin, D. P.; Egozy, A.; Stock, U.; Mayer, J. E., Jr.; Vacanti, J. P. Fabrication of a trileaflet heart valve scaffold from a polyhydroxyalkanoate biopolyester for use in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2000, 6, 183-188.
88. Leor, J.; Amsalem, Y.; Cohen, S. Cells, scaffolds, and molecules for myocardial tissue engineering. Pharmacol Ther. 2005, 105, 151-163.
89. Sun, M.; Zhou, P.; Pan, L. F.; Liu, S.; Yang, H. X. Enhanced cell affinity of the silk fibroin-modified PHBHHx material. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009, 20, 1743-1751.
90. Bagdadi, A. V.; Safari, M.; Dubey, P.; Basnett, P.; Sofokleous, P.; Humphrey, E.; Locke, I.; Edirisinghe, M.; Terracciano, C.; Boccaccini, A. R.; Knowles, J. C.; Harding, S. E.; Roy, I. Poly(3-hydroxyoctanoate), a promising new material for cardiac tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018, 12, e495-e512.
91. Köse, S.; Kaya, F. A.; Denkbaş, E. B.; Korkusuz, P.; Çetinkaya, F. D. Evaluation of biocompatibility of random or aligned electrospun polyhydroxybutyrate scaffolds combined with human mesenchymal stem cells. Turk J Biol. 2016, 40, 410-419.
92. Khorasani, M. T.; Mirmohammadi, S. A.; Irani, S. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) scaffolds as a model for nerve tissue engineering application: fabrication and in vitro assay. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2011, 60, 562-575.
93. Masaeli, E.; Morshed, M.; Nasr-Esfahani, M. H.; Sadri, S.; Hilderink, J.; van Apeldoorn, A.; van Blitterswijk, C. A.; Moroni, L. Fabrication, characterization and cellular compatibility of poly(hydroxy alkanoate) composite nanofibrous scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering. PLoS One. 2013, 8, e57157.
94. Masaeli, E.; Wieringa, P. A.; Morshed, M.; Nasr-Esfahani, M. H.; Sadri, S.; van Blitterswijk, C. A.; Moroni, L. Peptide functionalized polyhydroxyalkanoate nanofibrous scaffolds enhance Schwann cells activity. Nanomedicine. 2014, 10, 1559-1569.
95. Kuo, Y. C.; Huang, M. J. Material-driven differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells in neuron growth factor-grafted poly(ε-caprolactone)-poly(β-hydroxybutyrate) scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2012, 33, 5672-5682.
96. Bian, Y. Z.; Wang, Y.; Aibaidoula, G.; Chen, G. Q.; Wu, Q. Evaluation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials. 2009, 30, 217-225.
97. Xu, X. Y.; Li, X. T.; Peng, S. W.; Xiao, J. F.; Liu, C.; Fang, G.; Chen, K. C.; Chen, G. Q. The behaviour of neural stem cells on polyhydroxyalkanoate nanofiber scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2010, 31, 3967-3975.
98. Rahman, M.; Peng, X. L.; Zhao, X. H.; Gong, H. L.; Sun, X. D.; Wu, Q.; Wei, D. X. 3D bioactive cell-free scaffolds for in-vitro/in-vivo capture and directed osteoinduction of stem cells for bone tissue regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2021, 6, 4083-4095.
99. Wei, D. X.; Dao, J. W.; Liu, H. W.; Chen, G. Q. Suspended polyhydroxyalkanoate microspheres as 3D carriers for mammalian cell growth. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018, 46, 473-483.
100. Wei, D. X.; Dao, J. W.; Chen, G. Q. A micro-ark for cells: highly open porous polyhydroxyalkanoate microspheres as injectable scaffolds for tissue regeneration. Adv Mater. 2018, 30, e1802273.
101. Zhao, X. H.; Peng, X. L.; Gong, H. L.; Wei, D. X. Osteogenic differentiation system based on biopolymer nanoparticles for stem cells in simulated microgravity. Biomed Mater. 2021, 16, 044102.
102. Armiento, A. R.; Stoddart, M. J.; Alini, M.; Eglin, D. Biomaterials for articular cartilage tissue engineering: Learning from biology. Acta Biomater. 2018, 65, 1-20.
103. Decker, R. S. Articular cartilage and joint development from embryogenesis to adulthood. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017, 62, 50-56.
104. Swieszkowski, W.; Tuan, B. H.; Kurzydlowski, K. J.; Hutmacher, D. W. Repair and regeneration of osteochondral defects in the articular joints. Biomol Eng. 2007, 24, 489-495.
105. Asl, M. A.; Karbasi, S.; Beigi-Boroujeni, S.; Zamanlui Benisi, S.; Saeed, M. Evaluation of the effects of starch on polyhydroxybutyrate electrospun scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021, 191, 500-513.
106. Wei, D. X.; Chen, C. B.; Fang, G.; Li, S. Y.; Chen, G. Q. Application of polyhydroxyalkanoate binding protein PhaP as a bio-surfactant. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011, 91, 1037-1047.
107. Fan, L.; He, Z.; Peng, X.; Xie, J.; Su, F.; Wei, D. X.; Zheng, Y.; Yao, D. Injectable, intrinsically antibacterial conductive hydrogels with self-healing and pH stimulus responsiveness for epidermal sensors and wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021, 13, 53541-53552.
108. Fan, L.; Xie, J.; Zheng, Y.; Wei, D.; Yao, D.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, T. Antibacterial, self-adhesive, recyclable, and tough conductive composite hydrogels for ultrasensitive strain sensing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020, 12, 22225-22236.
109. Dhania, S.; Bernela, M.; Rani, R.; Parsad, M.; Grewal, S.; Kumari, S.; Thakur, R. Scaffolds the backbone of tissue engineering: Advancements in use of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA). Int J Biol Macromol. 2022, 208,243-259.
110. Doral, M. N.; Alam, M.; Bozkurt, M.; Turhan, E.; Atay, O. A.; Dönmez, G.; Maffulli, N. Functional anatomy of the Achilles tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010, 18, 638-643.
111. Ahmed, I. M.; Lagopoulos, M.; McConnell, P.; Soames, R. W.; Sefton, G. K. Blood supply of the Achilles tendon. J Orthop Res. 1998, 16, 591-596.
112. Theobald, P.; Benjamin, M.; Nokes, L.; Pugh, N. Review of the vascularisation of the human Achilles tendon. Injury. 2005, 36, 1267-1272.
113. Longo, U. G.; Lamberti, A.; Maffulli, N.; Denaro, V. Tendon augmentation grafts: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2010, 94, 165-188.
114. Wilkins, R.; Bisson, L. J. Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med. 2012, 40, 2154-2160.
115. Cetti, R.; Christensen, S. E.; Ejsted, R.; Jensen, N. M.; Jorgensen, U. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study and review of the literature. Am J Sports Med. 1993, 21, 791-799.
116. García-Germán, D.; Rubio-Quevedo, R.; Lopez-Goenaga, J.; Martin-Guinea, J. Achilles tendon recurrent rupture following surgical repair: report on two cases. Foot Ankle Surg. 2009, 15, 152-154.
117. Kusumbe, A. P.; Ramasamy, S. K.; Adams, R. H. Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone. Nature. 2014, 507, 323-328.
118. Straley, K. S.; Foo, C. W.; Heilshorn, S. C. Biomaterial design strategies for the treatment of spinal cord injuries. J Neurotrauma. 2010, 27, 1-19.
119. Novikov, L. N.; Novikova, L. N.; Mosahebi, A.; Wiberg, M.; Terenghi, G.; Kellerth, J. O. A novel biodegradable implant for neuronal rescue and regeneration after spinal cord injury. Biomaterials. 2002, 23, 3369-3376.
120. Wang, L.; Wang, Z. H.; Shen, C. Y.; You, M. L.; Xiao, J. F.; Chen, G. Q. Differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells grown in terpolyesters of 3-hydroxyalkanoates scaffolds into nerve cells. Biomaterials. 2010, 31, 1691-1698.
121. Zhang, C.; Zhao, L.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lin, J.; Chen, Z. Folate-mediated poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyoctanoate) nanoparticles for targeting drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010, 76, 10-16.
122. Pramual, S.; Assavanig, A.; Bergkvist, M.; Batt, C. A.; Sunintaboon, P.; Lirdprapamongkol, K.; Svasti, J.; Niamsiri, N. Development and characterization of bio-derived polyhydroxyalkanoate nanoparticles as a delivery system for hydrophobic photodynamic therapy agents. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016, 27, 40.
123. Li, Z.; Loh, X. J. Recent advances of using polyhydroxyalkanoate-based nanovehicles as therapeutic delivery carriers. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2017, 9, e1429.
124. Shah, M.; Ullah, N.; Choi, M. H.; Yoon, S. C. Nanoscale poly(4-hydroxybutyrate)-mPEG carriers for anticancer drugs delivery. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2014, 14, 8416-8421.
125. Nobes, G. A.; Marchessault, R. H.; Maysinger, D. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: materials for delivery systems. Drug Deliv. 1998, 5, 167-177.
126. Elmowafy, E.; Abdal-Hay, A.; Skouras, A.; Tiboni, M.; Casettari, L.; Guarino, V. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA): applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019, 16, 467-482.
127. Hu, J.; Wang, M.; Xiao, X.; Zhang, B.; Xie, Q.; Xu, X.; Li, S.; Zheng, Z.; Wei, D.; Zhang, X. A novel long-acting azathioprine polyhydroxyalkanoate nanoparticle enhances treatment efficacy for systemic lupus erythematosus with reduced side effects. Nanoscale. 2020, 12, 10799-10808.
128. Yan, Y.; Wei, D.; Li, J.; Zheng, J.; Shi, G.; Luo, W.; Pan, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; He, X.; Liu, D. A poly(L-lysine)-based hydrophilic star block co-polymer as a protein nanocarrier with facile encapsulation and pH-responsive release. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 2113-2120.
129. Wei, D.; Qiao, R.; Dao, J.; Su, J.; Jiang, C.; Wang, X.; Gao, M.; Zhong, J. Soybean lecithin-mediated nanoporous PLGA microspheres with highly entrapped and controlled released BMP-2 as a stem cell platform. Small. 2018, 14, e1800063.
130. Sendil, D.; Gürsel, I.; Wise, D. L.; Hasirci, V. Antibiotic release from biodegradable PHBV microparticles. J Control Release. 1999, 59, 207-217.
131. Kassab, A. C.; Xu, K.; Denkbaş, E. B.; Dou, Y.; Zhao, S.; Pişkin, E. Rifampicin carrying polyhydroxybutyrate microspheres as a potential chemoembolization agent. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1997, 8, 947-961.
132. Xiong, Y. C.; Yao, Y. C.; Zhan, X. Y.; Chen, G. Q. Application of polyhydroxyalkanoates nanoparticles as intracellular sustained drug-release vectors. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2010, 21, 127-140.
133. Türesin, F.; Gürsel, I.; Hasirci, V. Biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoate implants for osteomyelitis therapy: in vitro antibiotic release. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2001, 12, 195-207.
134. Yagmurlu, M. F.; Korkusuz, F.; Gürsel, I.; Korkusuz, P.; Ors, U.; Hasirci, V. Sulbactam-cefoperazone polyhydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate (PHBV) local antibiotic delivery system: in vivo effectiveness and biocompatibility in the treatment of implant-related experimental osteomyelitis. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999, 46, 494-503.
135. Gürsel, I.; Korkusuz, F.; Türesin, F.; Alaeddinoglu, N. G.; Hasirci, V. In vivo application of biodegradable controlled antibiotic release systems for the treatment of implant-related osteomyelitis. Biomaterials. 2001, 22, 73-80.
136. Scheithauer, E. C.; Li, W.; Ding, Y.; Harhaus, L.; Roether, J. A.; Boccaccini, A. R. Preparation and characterization of electrosprayed daidzein–loaded PHBV microspheres. Mater Lett. 2015, 158, 66-69.
137. Peng, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X. A long-acting BMP-2 release system based on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) nanoparticles modified by amphiphilic phospholipid for osteogenic differentiation. Biomed Res Int. 2016, 2016, 5878645.
138. Chen, R.; Yu, J.; Gong, H. L.; Jiang, Y.; Xue, M.; Xu, N.; Wei, D. X.; Shi, C. An easy long-acting BMP7 release system based on biopolymer nanoparticles for inducing osteogenic differentiation of adipose mesenchymal stem cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2020, 14, 964-972.
139. Shrivastav, A.; Kim, H. Y.; Kim, Y. R. Advances in the applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate nanoparticles for novel drug delivery system. Biomed Res Int. 2013, 2013, 581684.
140. Li, Z.; Yang, J.; Loh, X. J. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: opening doors for a sustainable future. NPG Asia Mater. 2016, 8, e265-e265.
141. Nelson, T.; Kaufman, E.; Kline, J.; Sokoloff, L. The extraneural distribution of gamma-hydroxybutyrate. J Neurochem. 1981, 37, 1345-1348.
142. Wang, B. L.; Wu, J. F.; Xiao, D.; Wu, B.; Wei, D. X. 3-hydroxybutyrate in the brain: biosynthesis, function, and disease therapy. Brain‐X. 2023, 1, e6.
143. Xiang, Y.; Wang, Q. Q.; Lan, X. Q.; Zhang, H. J.; Wei, D. X. Function and treatment strategies of β-hydroxybutyrate in aging. Smart Mater Med. 2023, 4, 160-172.
144. Zhao, Y.; Zou, B.; Shi, Z.; Wu, Q.; Chen, G. Q. The effect of 3-hydroxybutyrate on the in vitro differentiation of murine osteoblast MC3T3-E1 and in vivo bone formation in ovariectomized rats. Biomaterials. 2007, 28, 3063-3073.
145. Czechowska, J.; Skibiński, S.; Guzik, M.; Zima, A. Silver decorated βTCP-poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials (Basel). 2021, 14, 4227.
146. Chen, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, H.; Pang, X.; Liu, Y.; Tao, W.; Chen, X.; Zhang, P.; Chen, G. Q. Mechanism of reduced muscle atrophy via ketone body (D)-3-hydroxybutyrate. Cell Biosci. 2022, 12, 94.
147. Wang, Z.; Ma, K.; Jiang, X.; Xie, J.; Cai, P.; Li, F.; Liang, R.; Zhao, J.; Zheng, L. Electrospun poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate)/Octacalcium phosphate Nanofibrous membranes for effective guided bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020, 112, 110763.
148. Ang, S. L.; Shaharuddin, B.; Chuah, J. A.; Sudesh, K. Electrospun poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate)/silk fibroin film is a promising scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020, 145, 173-188.
149. Kourmentza, C.; Plácido, J.; Venetsaneas, N.; Burniol-Figols, A.; Varrone, C.; Gavala, H. N.; Reis, M. A. M. Recent advances and challenges towards sustainable polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production. Bioengineering (Basel). 2017, 4, 55.
150. Xu, N.; Peng, X. L.; Li, H. R.; Liu, J. X.; Cheng, J. S.; Qi, X. Y.; Ye, S. J.; Gong, H. L.; Zhao, X. H.; Yu, J.; Xu, G.; Wei, D. X. Marine-derived collagen as biomaterials for human health. Front Nutr. 2021, 8, 702108.
151. Volova, T.; Shishatskaya, E.; Sevastianov, V.; Efremov, S.; Mogilnaya, O. Results of biomedical investigations of PHB and PHB/PHV fibers. Biochem Eng J. 2003, 16, 125-133.
152. Turkyilmaz, S.; Chen, W. H.; Mitomo, H.; Regen, S. L. Loosening and reorganization of fluid phospholipid bilayers by chloroform. J Am Chem Soc. 2009, 131, 5068-5069.
