Biomaterials Translational ensures that all of its published journals follow the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

We aim to ensure the integrity of the academic record of all published or potential publications. Thus, we strive to ensure a prompt correction whenever a significant inaccuracy, misleading statement, or distorted report in publications is identified. If, after an appropriate investigation, an item proves to be fraudulent, it should be retracted.

Corrections

Errors in published papers may be identified in the form of a corrigendum or erratum when the Editor-in-Chief considers it appropriate to inform the journal readership about a previous error and makes a correction to the error in the published article. The corrigendum or erratum will be released separately, linked to the original published article.

Retractions

Retractions are considered and published when there are severe errors in an article that invalidate the conclusions. Retractions are also made in cases where there is evidence of publication malpractice, such as plagiarism, duplicate publication, or unethical research.

According to industry best practice and in accordance with COPE guidelines, Biomaterials Translational implements the following procedure if a retraction is confirmed:

1. A retraction note titled “Retraction: [article title]” approved by the authors and/or the editor is published in a subsequent issue of the journal and listed in the contents list.
2. In the electronic version, the retraction note is linked to the original article.
3. The online article is preceded by a screen containing the retraction note. It is to this screen that the link resolves; the reader can then proceed to the article itself.
4. The original article will be retained, watermarked on every page of the PDF article with the term “RETRACTED.”

Editorial expressions of concern

Where substantial doubt arises as to the transparency or integrity of a submitted or published article, journal editors may consider issuing an expression of concern. However, expressions of concern should only be issued if an investigation into the problems relating to the article has proven inconclusive and if there remains strong indicators that the concerns are valid. In some rare cases, an editorial expression of concern may also be issued when an investigation is underway but a judgment will not be available for a considerable time.

The expression of concern will be linked back to the published article it relates to.